[Fwd: Question]

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [Fwd: Question]
Date: 2003-04-24 01:54:12
Message-ID: 3EA743C4.3010105@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Hi guys,

Does anyone have the inclination to talk to these guys?

:-)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Question
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:49:21 -0400
From: CGSI Inc. - GCIS Inc. <info(at)cgsi(dot)ca>
Reply-To: <info(at)cgsi(dot)ca>
Organization: Le Centre General des Services Internet Inc.
To: <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
CC: <info(at)gcis(dot)ca>

**
**
**
*Hello. We are considering using Postgre SQL over SQL server. We need
the trigger*
*capability. However, I am told by a few programmers that Postgre
operated slower*
*than say SQL server or other database solutions in the same category.*
**
*First, is there any thruth to this? If it is so, how could you
explain that? What are*
*the remedies?*
* *
*
(We are assuming that all platforms run on all the same servers, hence
have access*
*to all the same amount of memory and processing power).*
*** *
*Thank you for your answer*
*** *
*Serge Thibodeau,*
*GCIS Inc.*
*sthibodeau(at)gcis(dot)ca <mailto:sthibodeau(at)gcis(dot)ca>*
*** *
*** *
*_________________________________________*

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2003-04-24 02:31:23 [Fwd: HP World 2003 Call For Papers]
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-04-24 01:31:14 Re: Slashdot article -OSNews