Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] More thoughts about FE/BE protocol

From: Wei Weng <wweng(at)kencast(dot)com>
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More thoughts about FE/BE protocol
Date: 2003-04-15 23:29:35
Message-ID: 3E9C95DF.2060205@kencast.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
>
>
>(a) the problems are "swapped in" now; if I don't continue with this
>work I'll probably forget a lot of the issues.
>
>(b) there are some things in 7.3 --- autocommit being a big one --- that we
>can *not* put off changing, or we'll be stuck with them forevermore.
>
>(c) the interfaces do not have to catch up in time for 7.4 release,
>because we'll still support the old protocol.
>
>			regards, tom lane
>
>  
>
What is this "auto-commit" about? Any place where I can read about it?

Thanks

Wei


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kurt RoeckxDate: 2003-04-15 23:39:44
Subject: Re: Transaction problem?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-04-15 23:28:27
Subject: Re: Are we losing momentum?

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Grant FinnemoreDate: 2003-04-16 05:24:04
Subject: Re: First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-04-15 23:08:30
Subject: First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group