Christoph Haller wrote:
>>Given the repeatedly-asked-for functionalities (like error codes)
>>for which the stopper has been the long-threatened protocol revision,
>>I'd think it might be boring, but would hardly be thankless. Heck, I'd
> 
> 
>>expect a few whoops of joy around the lists.
>>
> 
> Yes. Error codes would be great.

Particularly if they arrive in conjunction with Bruce's "Nested 
Transaction" implementation. I image many people would like to 
create a subtransaction, which, if it fails due to a unique key 
violation, could recover and perform an update.

I'd personally like some way of mapping RI-related messages into 
  application-specific, perhaps localized, messages. Error codes 
will provide a nice starting point. Will the action and object 
upon which the action is being attempted also be available?

Mike Mascari
mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com

In response to

• Re: Error codes revisited at 2003-03-06 08:18:43 from Christoph Haller

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Justin Clift	Date: 2003-03-06 13:23:08
	Subject: Postgresql.org site outage
Previous:	From: btober	Date: 2003-03-06 08:23:14
	Subject: Re: My contract has been renewed