>
> Given the repeatedly-asked-for functionalities (like error codes)
> for which the stopper has been the long-threatened protocol revision,
> I'd think it might be boring, but would hardly be thankless. Heck, I'd

> expect a few whoops of joy around the lists.
>
Yes. Error codes would be great.

Regards, Christoph

Responses

• Re: Error codes revisited at 2003-03-06 08:41:03 from Mike Mascari

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tatsuo Ishii	Date: 2003-03-06 08:18:58
	Subject: Re: Win32 Powerfail testing
Previous:	From: Justin Clift	Date: 2003-03-06 08:07:35
	Subject: Re: ETA for PostgreSQL 7.3.3?