Josh Berkus wrote:
> Further, Joe Conway gave me a guesstimate of 6k per max_fsm_pages which seems
> rather high ... in fact, the default settings for this value (10000) would
> swamp the memory used by the rest of Postgres.
I don't recall (and cannot find in my sent mail) ever making that
guesstimate. Can you provide some context?
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2003-02-24 19:25:38|
|Subject: Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations|
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2003-02-24 19:00:37|
|Subject: Re: partitioning os swap data log tempdb|