Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations
Date: 2003-02-24 19:11:34
Message-ID: 3E5A6E66.4030408@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Further, Joe Conway gave me a guesstimate of 6k per max_fsm_pages which seems
> rather high ... in fact, the default settings for this value (10000) would
> swamp the memory used by the rest of Postgres.

I don't recall (and cannot find in my sent mail) ever making that
guesstimate. Can you provide some context?

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-02-24 19:25:38 Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-02-24 19:00:37 Re: partitioning os swap data log tempdb