Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations
Date: 2003-02-24 19:11:34
Message-ID: 3E5A6E66.4030408@joeconway.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Further, Joe Conway gave me a guesstimate of 6k per max_fsm_pages which seems 
> rather high ... in fact, the default settings for this value (10000) would 
> swamp the memory used by the rest of Postgres.

I don't recall (and cannot find in my sent mail) ever making that 
guesstimate. Can you provide some context?

Joe




In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-02-24 19:25:38
Subject: Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-02-24 19:00:37
Subject: Re: partitioning os swap data log tempdb

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group