Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Ron Mayer <ron(at)intervideo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Date: 2003-01-31 04:54:17
Message-ID: 3E3A0179.62A4947@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > I agree with Tom on yanking the plug while it's operating. Do you
> > know the difference between kill -9 and yanking the plug?
>
> Kill -9 seems to me _less_ severe than yanking the plug but much easier
> to automate, so that could be the first thing to test. You have no hope
> of passing the pull-the-plug test if you can't survive even kill -9.
>
> Perhaps we could have a special "reliability-regression" test that does
> "kill -9 postmaster", repeatedly, at random intervals, and checks for
> consistency ?
>
> Maybe we will find even some options for some OS'es to "force-unmount"
> disks. I guess that setting IDE disk's to read-only with hdparm could
> possibly achieve something like that on Linux.

Get VMWare for Linux, run whatever OS you like in it and "kill -9" the
virtual machine. That's as close as you can get to "yanking" without
wearing out your power plugs.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Giles Lean 2003-01-31 05:03:22 Re: On file locking
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2003-01-31 04:42:03 Re: On file locking