Re: What goes into the security doc?

From: "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What goes into the security doc?
Date: 2003-01-24 15:00:52
Message-ID: 3E310ED4.2715.5D39B3DB@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On 22 Jan 2003 at 13:29, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> Recommend always running "initdb -W" and setting all pg_hba entries to md5.

Thanks. I also encountered this item on IRC:

[09:26] <fede2> Guys, is there a problem with using /bin/true of
/bin/false as the shell of the postgres user? The docs only says
"adduser postgres" , witch will give postgres a nice shell.
[09:27] <fede2> I'm asking because the guys from Gentoo (thats a
distro FWIW), want to use either /bin/false of /bin/true as postgres'
shell.
[09:27] <dvl> fede2: it means you won't be able to become the
postgres user to run commands.
[09:27] <mmc_> ... to run SHELL commands.
[09:29] <fede2> dvl: Aldo it's not the same, one could use "su -c foo
postgres" to workarround it.
[09:30] <fede2> dvl: I was wondering if it had an even heavier
reason, besides that.
[09:34] <mmc_> fede2: tha manpage of su says, that -c args is treated
by the login shell !
[09:35] <fede2> mmc_: Hmm.. true. That makes it a heavy enough
reason. Thanks.
[09:35] * fede2 departs
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-01-24 15:36:43 Re: What goes into the security doc?
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 2003-01-24 11:34:38 Re: Patch for minor error

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-01-24 15:22:16 Re: Odd subselect in target list behavior WRT aggregates
Previous Message John Liu 2003-01-24 14:32:13 poor performance of subquery in psql