Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ?

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ?
Date: 2003-01-20 08:24:37
Message-ID: 3E2BFF9D.23075.D9BF0FA@localhost (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On 18 Jan 2003 at 14:50, Bruno Baguette wrote:
> Does somebody knows why this eWeek article that does a benchmark of
> theses Databases (DB2 7.2 ,SQL Server, MySQL,Oracle9i and ASE) whithout
> having added PostgreSQL ?
> 
> Here's the URL of the article :
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,293,00.asp

I read it and it gave me a feeling that benchmarks were run on windows. That 
can explain why postgresql is absent from there.


Bye
 Shridhar

--
statistics, n.:	A system for expressing your political prejudices in convincing	
scientific guise.


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Jason HihnDate: 2003-01-20 14:42:03
Subject: Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Justin CliftDate: 2003-01-19 07:07:30
Subject: Would having interviews with recognised PostgreSQL people be useful?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group