Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Upgrading rant.

From: mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Upgrading rant.
Date: 2003-01-03 19:19:28
Message-ID: 3E15E240.90702@mohawksoft.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing wrote:

>I don't think the main issues are with file _formats_ but rather with
>system file structures - AFAIK it is a fundamental design decision
>(arguably a design flaw ;( ) that we use system tables straight from
>page cache via C structure pointers, even though there seems to be a
>layer called "storage Manager" which should hide the on-disk format
>completely.
>

I don't think that is a big issue, no one is saying the file format 
should "change" or be used any differently, just that the structures be 
more rigid, and anyone wishing to make a change, had better also have an 
upgrade strategy.

Perhaps there could be a review/document phase for 7.4 where the 
structures are cleaned up, checked, and perhaps have a couple "reserved" 
entries added. (As governed by efficiecy) and have one last "speak now, 
or forever hold your peace" and cast them in stone.

I think, as professional standards go, this is probably LONG over due.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Lamar OwenDate: 2003-01-03 20:16:34
Subject: Re: Upgrading rant.
Previous:From: Serguei MokhovDate: 2003-01-03 18:23:06
Subject: Re: complie error on windows

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group