Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I know one possible objection is that it takes too long to build the
> complete documentation set. But you can do an SGML syntax check that
> takes a few seconds on modern machines and catches most mistakes.
That sounds great. How to you do the SGML syntax check?
> Compared to making the documentation easier to use and more "marketable" I
> think this is a price we have to pay.
Making the docs into one book should also allow better hyperlink
cross-referencing. That will be a welcome improvement.
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-01-02 23:32:07|
|Subject: Re: Documentation in book length |
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2003-01-02 23:08:49|
|Subject: Documentation in book length|