On 2 Jan 2003 at 7:53, Charles H. Woloszynski wrote:

> Yeah, the registration was painless and enough options to disable it
> annoying you. Count my vote cast for PostgreSQL.  I encourage everyone
> else to do the same.  In the big picture, marketing statements like
> this survey mean alot more than most technical folks want to
> acknowledge.  
> 
> Please vote for your favorite database.

Coincidentally, I've just started up a voting script project... see 
http://polls.unixathome.org/
-- 
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/

In response to

• Re: Cast your vote ... at 2003-01-02 12:53:17 from Charles H. Woloszynski

Responses

• Re: [HACKERS] Cast your vote ... at 2003-01-02 20:30:57 from Jeroen T. Vermeulen

pgsql-announce by date

Next:	From: Jeroen T. Vermeulen	Date: 2003-01-02 20:30:57
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cast your vote ...
Previous:	From: Charles H. Woloszynski	Date: 2003-01-02 12:53:17
	Subject: Re: Cast your vote ...

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2003-01-02 20:20:35
	Subject: Re: pg_dump.options.diff
Previous:	From: Dan Langille	Date: 2003-01-02 20:05:07
	Subject: new project - PostgresSQL based voting script

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: Peter Darley	Date: 2003-01-02 20:15:27
	Subject: Re: Aggregate working on ordered data
Previous:	From: Dan Langille	Date: 2003-01-02 20:05:07
	Subject: new project - PostgresSQL based voting script