Re: Version Numbering

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Version Numbering
Date: 2002-12-16 06:59:25
Message-ID: 3DFDC725.23245.1220EE@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 14 Dec 2002 at 21:52, Justin Clift wrote:

> Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> <snip>
> > What happened to PostgreSQL and KDE3 will never happen to pgAdmin. pgAdmin is
> > owned by a community of free developpers. Like other free software
> > initiatives, they are gifts to Humanity.
>
> Hear, Hear.

I differ in opinion here. KDE is a community project as well. Nothing stops
anyone to ship a modified version of PGAdmin as long as contributions are masde
open.

Of course, RedHat have good reason to customize KDE given the exposure that
project has. I don't think PGAdmin have exposure of that scale. For this
reason, it might continue to ship uncustomized.

Bye
Shridhar

--
Cheit's Lament: If you help a friend in need, he is sure to remember you-- the
next time he's in need.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Brown 2002-12-16 07:15:49 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-12-16 02:23:27 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group