Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: idle connection timeout ...

From: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
To: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>,PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: idle connection timeout ...
Date: 2002-10-29 10:11:29
Message-ID: 3DBE5ED1.4040803@mascari.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Karel Zak wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 03:31:22PM -0400, Mike Mascari wrote:
> 
>>Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>>>Added to TODO:
>>>
>>>	* Allow limits on per-db/user connections
>>>
>>
>>Could I suggest that such a feature falls under the category of 
>>resource limits, and that the TODO should read something like:
>>
>>Implement the equivalent of Oracle PROFILEs.
> 
> 
>  Yes! Please.... it's better than all discussions about some ugly
>  variables. The PROFILE is better extendable and it's user 
>  specific and in the system with ROLEs it really cool and simple
>  set user's system options.
>  
>  I talked about it more times, but is still ignore :-) I don't want 
>  to maintain my databases by SET command.

It seems we are in the minority. :-(

Mike Mascari
mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com




In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Vladimir ChukharevDate: 2002-10-29 10:32:01
Subject: Is regress/report.php in use?
Previous:From: Ives LandrieuDate: 2002-10-29 10:11:14
Subject: Strange cost computation?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group