| From: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: idle connection timeout ... |
| Date: | 2002-10-29 10:11:29 |
| Message-ID: | 3DBE5ED1.4040803@mascari.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Karel Zak wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 03:31:22PM -0400, Mike Mascari wrote:
>
>>Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>>>Added to TODO:
>>>
>>> * Allow limits on per-db/user connections
>>>
>>
>>Could I suggest that such a feature falls under the category of
>>resource limits, and that the TODO should read something like:
>>
>>Implement the equivalent of Oracle PROFILEs.
>
>
> Yes! Please.... it's better than all discussions about some ugly
> variables. The PROFILE is better extendable and it's user
> specific and in the system with ROLEs it really cool and simple
> set user's system options.
>
> I talked about it more times, but is still ignore :-) I don't want
> to maintain my databases by SET command.
It seems we are in the minority. :-(
Mike Mascari
mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vladimir Chukharev | 2002-10-29 10:32:01 | Is regress/report.php in use? |
| Previous Message | Ives Landrieu | 2002-10-29 10:11:14 | Strange cost computation? |