| From: | "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
| Date: | 2002-10-11 10:24:15 |
| Message-ID: | 3DA6F427.24136.958BD13@localhost |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 11 Oct 2002 at 16:16, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to add some replication features to postgres (yes, I have
> already looked at ongoing work), in a peer to peer manner. The goal
> is to achive `nearly complete fault tolerence' by replicating data.
Sounds a lot like usogres. You got it running. (I never had a chance.) I would
like to hear how it compares against it.
Can anybody comment how maintained usogres is. It covers an important area of
replication but I am not sure how maintained that is. If it is not, I suggest
we pick it up and finish it.
HTH
Bye
Shridhar
--
You go slow, be gentle. It's no one-way street -- you know how youfeel and
that's all. It's how the girl feels too. Don't press. Ifthe girl feels
anything for you at all, you'll know. -- Kirk, "Charlie X", stardate 1535.8
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anuradha Ratnaweera | 2002-10-11 10:29:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
| Previous Message | Anuradha Ratnaweera | 2002-10-11 10:16:57 | Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anuradha Ratnaweera | 2002-10-11 10:29:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
| Previous Message | Anuradha Ratnaweera | 2002-10-11 10:16:57 | Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |