Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

use [PERF] instead of

From: Jean-Luc Lachance <jllachan(at)nsd(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: use [PERF] instead of
Date: 2002-10-03 21:12:02
Message-ID: 3D9CB2A2.47A4F6F1@nsd.ca (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackerspgsql-performancepgsql-sql
May I suggest that instead of [pgsql-performance] that [PERF] be used to
save some of the subject line.

Ron Johnson wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 11:51, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
> > Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> >
> > >On 3 Oct 2002 at 11:57, Robert Treat wrote:
> [snip]
> > PostgreSQL allows you to improve execution plans by giving the planner a
> > hint.
> > In addition to that: if you need REAL performance and if you are running
> > similar queries consider using SPI.
> 
> What is SPI?
> 
> --
> +------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Ron Johnson, Jr.     mailto:ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net          |
> | Jefferson, LA  USA   http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson  |
> |                                                            |
> | "What other evidence do you have that they are terrorists, |
> |  other than that they trained in these camps?"             |
> |   17-Sep-2002 Katie Couric to an FBI agent regarding the 5 |
> |   men arrested near Buffalo NY                             |
> +------------------------------------------------------------+
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Mike BenoitDate: 2002-10-03 23:09:56
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Performance while loading data and indexing
Previous:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2002-10-03 21:09:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Large databases, performance

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Giles LeanDate: 2002-10-03 21:15:29
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Previous:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2002-10-03 21:09:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Large databases, performance

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2002-10-03 22:03:19
Subject: Re: [SQL] [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
Previous:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2002-10-03 21:09:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Large databases, performance

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2002-10-03 22:03:19
Subject: Re: [SQL] [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
Previous:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2002-10-03 21:09:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Large databases, performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group