| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about |
| Date: | 2002-08-30 17:51:35 |
| Message-ID: | 3D6FB0A7.1080409@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway wrote:
> I'm looking at this now. I suspect the easy fix is to remove
> ExecClearTuple from per_MultiFuncCall, but I'll try to understand what's
> going on first.
>
On second thought, *all* functions failing is what you expected, right
Tom? I just changed TupleGetDatum() as we discussed:
#define TupleGetDatum(_slot, _tuple) \
PointerGetDatum(ExecStoreTuple(_tuple, _slot, InvalidBuffer, false))
and now everything works again. Is this the preferred fix and/or is it
worth spending more time to dig into this?
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew T. OConnor | 2002-08-30 17:59:22 | Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess - where to store the own data |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-30 17:34:32 | Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-30 18:51:43 | Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-30 17:34:32 | Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about |