Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: int64 timestamp patch for contrib/pg_controldata

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, sugita(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: int64 timestamp patch for contrib/pg_controldata
Date: 2002-07-31 23:09:12
Message-ID: 3D486E18.6B7C086A@fourpalms.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
...
> I thought they were in /contrib because we didn't want them by default
> in the admin's path.  They have to go looking for them to use them.  Is
> that still a valid concern?

May be a valid concern, but not the right solution.

If we are that worried about misuse, then we should have them print a
banner and prompt for confirmation. And have them accept a "-q" to just
shut up and do it.

                  - Thomas

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-08-01 01:17:47
Subject: Re: int64 timestamp patch for contrib/pg_controldata
Previous:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2002-07-31 22:24:20
Subject: Re: prepareable statements

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group