> I had a note that pg_resetxlog needs to be fixed as well; have you
> looked at that?
Hmm. I was playing with it recently and did not notice a problem (but
maybe didn't play long enough to see one if it existed). Why would the
program need to be changed? Doesn't it use a common definition of the
control file structure to do its thing? Does it read in the old one and
modify it in place (which would mean new fields would be transparent) or
does it pick up each field individually??
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: sugita||Date: 2002-07-31 07:03:34|
|Subject: Re: int64 timestamp patch for contrib/pg_controldata|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2002-07-31 06:56:42|
|Subject: Re: int64 timestamp patch for contrib/pg_controldata |