Re: small dblink patch

Tom Lane wrote:
> This isn't going to fix the problem --- all the functions are still
> declared to take type NAME, which will not be long enough for
> qualified names. You need to replace the use of NAME with use of
> TEXT.

> I don't particularly care for that answer. Would instead suggest you
> borrow the coding now being used in sequence.c and other places where
> text arguments are interpreted as relation names:

OK - this patch is a bit larger -- followed your advise, and moved
internal declarations from dblink.h to dblink.c while I was at it.

Please apply if there are no more objections.

Thanks,

Joe