| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers) |
| Date: | 2002-05-20 00:40:15 |
| Message-ID: | 3CE845EF.9020902@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> It's not too soon to start thinking about documentation and
> regression tests for SRFs ...
Attached is a regression test patch for SRFs. I based it on the test
scripts that I have been using, minus the C function tests and without
calls to random() -- figured random() wouldn't work too well for a
regression test ;-)
Joe
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| srf.2002.05.19.2.patch | text/plain | 21.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lincoln Yeoh | 2002-05-20 06:35:09 | Re: SASL, compression? |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-05-19 23:33:53 | SRF rescan testing |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bear Giles | 2002-05-20 06:39:24 | revised SSL patches |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-05-19 23:33:53 | SRF rescan testing |