Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers)

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers)
Date: 2002-05-20 00:40:15
Message-ID: 3CE845EF.9020902@joeconway.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
 > It's not too soon to start thinking about documentation and
 > regression tests for SRFs ...

Attached is a regression test patch for SRFs. I based it on the test
scripts that I have been using, minus the C function tests and without 
calls to random() -- figured random() wouldn't work too well for a 
regression test ;-)

Joe


Attachment: srf.2002.05.19.2.patch
Description: text/plain (21.8 KB)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Lincoln YeohDate: 2002-05-20 06:35:09
Subject: Re: SASL, compression?
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2002-05-19 23:33:53
Subject: SRF rescan testing

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bear GilesDate: 2002-05-20 06:39:24
Subject: revised SSL patches
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2002-05-19 23:33:53
Subject: SRF rescan testing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group