| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers) |
| Date: | 2002-05-16 05:30:33 |
| Message-ID: | 3CE343F9.5080208@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway wrote:
>>
>
> Attached patch takes care of this case. It also passes my previous
> test
Sorry, I just noticed that I did not finish modifying the comments that
were cut-and-pasted from elsewhere. This patch includes better comments.
Joe
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| srf.2002.05.15.2.patch | text/plain | 3.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-05-16 06:21:40 | Re: A fairly obvious optimization? |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-05-16 05:16:28 | Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Gray | 2002-05-16 17:46:26 | Re: more verbose SSL session info for psql |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-05-16 05:16:28 | Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers) |