Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers)

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers)
Date: 2002-05-16 05:30:33
Message-ID: 3CE343F9.5080208@joeconway.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Joe Conway wrote:
 >>
 >
 > Attached patch takes care of this case. It also passes my previous
 > test

Sorry, I just noticed that I did not finish modifying the comments that 
were cut-and-pasted from elsewhere. This patch includes better comments.

Joe


Attachment: srf.2002.05.15.2.patch
Description: text/plain (3.4 KB)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2002-05-16 06:21:40
Subject: Re: A fairly obvious optimization?
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2002-05-16 05:16:28
Subject: Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers)

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: John GrayDate: 2002-05-16 17:46:26
Subject: Re: more verbose SSL session info for psql
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2002-05-16 05:16:28
Subject: Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group