Tom Lane wrote:
> Kristis Makris <kristis(dot)makris(at)datasoft(dot)com> writes:
> > -#define PG_BINARY_W "w"
> > +#define PG_BINARY_W "a"
> Surely this would break a lot of other uses?
Practically no. misc.c is the only place where
PG_BINARY_W is used.
> I don't object to writing logfiles in append mode... but the
> PG_BINARY_x symbols probably shouldn't be used for logfiles
> in the first place, and in any case we need to distinguish
> "write" from "append" mode. I think a more extensive patch
> that defines suitable PG_APPEND symbols may be called for.
I would define PG_BINARY_A and change misc.c to use
In response to
pgsql-odbc by date
|Next:||From: Corey W. Gibbs||Date: 2002-05-09 14:47:24|
|Subject: Question about VB and Cursor Location|
|Previous:||From: Hiroshi Inoue||Date: 2002-05-09 01:17:07|
|Subject: Re: Parse Errors with prepared query|