Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Date: 2002-04-25 01:28:46
Message-ID: 3CC75BCE.83032A1E@tpf.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > > >
> > > > I voted not only ? but also 2 and 3.
> > > > And haven't I asked twice or so if it's a vote ?
> > >
> > > Yes, it is a vote, and now that we see how everyone feels, we can
> > > decide what to do.
> > >
> > > Hiroshi, you can't vote for 2, 3, and ?.
> >
> > Why ?
> > I don't think the items are exclusive.
> 
> Well, 2 says roll back only after transaction aborts,

Sorry for my poor understanding.
Isn't it 1 ?

regards, 
Hiroshi Inoue
	http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-04-25 01:29:47
Subject: Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Previous:From: Michael LoftisDate: 2002-04-25 01:26:20
Subject: Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group