Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
Date: 2002-04-16 05:23:48
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Hiroshi Inoue writes:
> > Probably I overlooked the conclusion then.
> > What was the conclusion of the discussion ?
> Personally, I think there wasn't any.  Personally part 2, showing some
> code is always a good way for new contributors to show they're for real.

Certainly but once an accomplished fact is there, it requires
a great deal of efforts to put it back to the neutral position.
For example, all I've done this month are such kind of things.

Hiroshi Inoue

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2002-04-16 07:10:02
Subject: Re: ecpg/preproc/preproc.y now generates lots of warnings
Previous:From: Gavin SherryDate: 2002-04-16 05:17:25
Subject: Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Jochem van DietenDate: 2002-04-16 10:19:12
Subject: Re: Alter/update large tables - VERRRY annoying behaviour!
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-04-16 05:15:11
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group