Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
Date: 2002-04-16 05:23:48
Message-ID: 3CBBB564.4880A200@tpf.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue writes:
> 
> > Probably I overlooked the conclusion then.
> > What was the conclusion of the discussion ?
> 
> Personally, I think there wasn't any.  Personally part 2, showing some
> code is always a good way for new contributors to show they're for real.

Certainly but once an accomplished fact is there, it requires
a great deal of efforts to put it back to the neutral position.
For example, all I've done this month are such kind of things.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2002-04-16 07:10:02
Subject: Re: ecpg/preproc/preproc.y now generates lots of warnings
Previous:From: Gavin SherryDate: 2002-04-16 05:17:25
Subject: Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Jochem van DietenDate: 2002-04-16 10:19:12
Subject: Re: Alter/update large tables - VERRRY annoying behaviour!
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-04-16 05:15:11
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group