Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Hiroshi Inoue writes:
> > Probably I overlooked the conclusion then.
> > What was the conclusion of the discussion ?
> Personally, I think there wasn't any. Personally part 2, showing some
> code is always a good way for new contributors to show they're for real.
Certainly but once an accomplished fact is there, it requires
a great deal of efforts to put it back to the neutral position.
For example, all I've done this month are such kind of things.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Michael Meskes||Date: 2002-04-16 07:10:02|
|Subject: Re: ecpg/preproc/preproc.y now generates lots of warnings|
|Previous:||From: Gavin Sherry||Date: 2002-04-16 05:17:25|
|Subject: Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data |
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Jochem van Dieten||Date: 2002-04-16 10:19:12|
|Subject: Re: Alter/update large tables - VERRRY annoying behaviour!|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-04-16 05:15:11|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch|