Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
Date: 2002-04-16 03:41:25
Message-ID: 3CBB9D65.EB181BE0@tpf.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > >
> > > > For example, I don't understand what pg_depend intends.
> > > > Is there any consensus on it ?
> > >
> > > Uh, we know we want dependency checking to fix many problems;  see TODO
> > > dependency checking section.
> >
> > Yes I know it's a very siginificant mechanism. It would contibute
> > e.g. to the DROP COLUMN implementation considerably but no one
> > referred to pg_depend in the recent discussion about DROP COLUMN.
> > So I've thought pg_depend is for something else.
> 
> Oh, clearly pg_depend will fix many of our problems, or make some
> problems much easier to fix.  I am excited to see it happening!
> 
> We had a pg_depend discussion about 9 months ago and hashed out a plan
> but were just waiting for someone to do the work.

Probably I overlooked the conclusion then.
What was the conclusion of the discussion ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2002-04-16 03:42:35
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-04-16 03:35:57
Subject: Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2002-04-16 03:42:35
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-04-16 03:35:57
Subject: Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group