Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
Date: 2002-04-16 03:18:16
Message-ID: 3CBB97F8.22DD9441@tpf.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> >
> > For example, I don't understand what pg_depend intends.
> > Is there any consensus on it ?
> 
> Uh, we know we want dependency checking to fix many problems;  see TODO
> dependency checking section.

Yes I know it's a very siginificant mechanism. It would contibute
e.g. to the DROP COLUMN implementation considerably but no one
referred to pg_depend in the recent discussion about DROP COLUMN.
So I've thought pg_depend is for something else. 

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-04-16 03:18:52
Subject: Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2002-04-16 02:59:19
Subject: Re: Stumbled upon a time bug...

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2002-04-16 03:19:45
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-04-16 02:58:51
Subject: Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group