| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts |
| Date: | 2002-04-16 01:55:08 |
| Message-ID: | 3CBB847C.D72E5DE9@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>
> Of course, we would review any patch before application. I guess the
> full path is:
>
> o Do we want this feature?
> o How do we want the feature to behave?
> o How do we want the feature implemented?
> o Submit patch
> o Review patch
> o Apply patch
>
> I assume your point is that people shouldn't send in big patches
> without going through the discussion first. Yes, that is ideal, but if
> they don't, we just discuss it after the patch appears, and then decide
> if we want to apply it or ask for modifications.
For example, I don't understand what pg_depend intends.
Is there any consensus on it ?
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-04-16 02:02:10 | Re: Operators and schemas |
| Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-04-16 01:53:49 | Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-04-16 02:45:59 | Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-16 01:37:12 | Re: YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch |