Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
Date: 2002-04-16 01:55:08
Message-ID: 3CBB847C.D72E5DE9@tpf.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> 
> Of course, we would review any patch before application.  I guess the
> full path is:
> 
>         o  Do we want this feature?
>         o  How do we want the feature to behave?
>         o  How do we want the feature implemented?
>         o  Submit patch
>         o  Review patch
>         o  Apply patch
> 
> I assume your point is that people shouldn't send in big patches
> without going through the discussion first.  Yes, that is ideal, but if
> they don't, we just discuss it after the patch appears, and then decide
> if we want to apply it or ask for modifications.

For example, I don't understand what pg_depend intends.
Is there any consensus on it ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-04-16 02:02:10
Subject: Re: Operators and schemas
Previous:From: Curt SampsonDate: 2002-04-16 01:53:49
Subject: Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2002-04-16 02:45:59
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-04-16 01:37:12
Subject: Re: YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group