| From: | Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Domain Support -- another round |
| Date: | 2002-03-21 17:02:28 |
| Message-ID: | 3C9A1224.4F655F@fourpalms.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
...
> So, although I agree with you in principle, I believe that in these
> cases we should stick to the standard and avoid gratuitous extensions.
Hmm. In any case, supporting arrays (esp. if it is not allowed in the
standard) should not be a requirement for implementing the DOMAIN
functionality. No point in arguing principles on just, uh, principles,
when we could actually be getting something good done ;)
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fernando Nasser | 2002-03-21 17:04:54 | Re: Domain Support -- another round |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-03-21 17:02:13 | Re: Problem with reloading groups in pg_hba.conf |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fernando Nasser | 2002-03-21 17:04:54 | Re: Domain Support -- another round |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-03-21 16:58:53 | Re: pg_dump and transactions |