Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ??

From: Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: Colin Faber <cfaber(at)fpsn(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ??
Date: 2002-02-26 17:15:42
Message-ID: 3C7BC2BE.47E69935@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

...

Agreed.

> For PostgreSQL to achieve its real potential, the game must be played.

Hmm. Would "PostgreSQL version (Oracle + 1)i" be too transparent? ;)

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kumar Khare 2002-02-26 17:30:32 Re: Implementation Proposal For Add Free Behind Capability For Large Sequential Scan
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-02-26 16:59:16 Re: quotes in SET grammar