Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

From: "Keith G(dot) Murphy" <keithmur(at)mindspring(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Date: 2002-01-22 17:29:10
Message-ID: 3C4DA166.6D358B42@mindspring.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

"Keith G. Murphy" wrote:
>
>
> It's not like the GPL really *prevents* them from contributing...
>
I see further down in the thread (which looks like another thread to my
somewhat-broken mailreader), that the offending wording had already been
removed/changed.

I seem to have provoked an off-topic discussion (but not the flamewar I
dreaded). Sorry I hadn't looked ahead and preempted it.

But I'm glad that the inflammatory wording is gone.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeffrey W. Baker 2002-01-22 17:38:17 Re: 7.1.3 -> 7.2
Previous Message Thomas F. O'Connell 2002-01-22 17:04:16 7.1.3 -> 7.2

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-01-22 18:33:54 RC1 finally wrapped ...
Previous Message Chris Humphries 2002-01-22 16:53:43 Re: TODO question and claim