> > > * Make it easier to create a database owned by someone who can't createdb,
> > > perhaps CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH USER = "user"
> > CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH OWNER = "user"
> A much better idea. There is no conflict in using OWNER here.
Does this have the multiple "WITH xxx" clauses which were discussed
earlier? That is a nonstarter for syntax. There are other places in the
grammar having "with clauses" and multiple arguments or subclauses, and
having the shift/reduce issues resolved...
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-01-08 03:48:04|
|Subject: Re: ecpg compile error on AIX|
|Previous:||From: Hiroshi Inoue||Date: 2002-01-08 02:20:30|
|Subject: Re: Problem with view and fetch_fields|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Christopher Kings-Lynne||Date: 2002-01-08 03:58:11|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2002-01-07 18:56:45|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgcryto strangeness... |