Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > Cancel interrupts are accepted at CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS
> > or while waiting for a lock.
> > Die interrupts are accepted at CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS or
> > at the time when they are received while interrupts
> > are allowed. Is my understanding right ?
> 
> No, I don't think so.  Both types of interrupts can be honored during
> the signal handler only if ImmediateInterruptOK is true.  It is true
> *only* while waiting for a lock or while waiting for client input.

Oh I see. But this seems to change the behabior significantly
at least for die signals.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

• Re: pgsql/src backend/tcop/postgres.c include/misc ... at 2002-01-05 04:08:18 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: pgsql/src backend/tcop/postgres.c include/misc ... at 2002-01-05 04:35:25 from Tom Lane

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2002-01-05 04:35:25
	Subject: Re: pgsql/src backend/tcop/postgres.c include/misc ...
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2002-01-05 04:08:18
	Subject: Re: pgsql/src backend/tcop/postgres.c include/misc ...