Re: JDBC 3.0 / JDK 1.4 build issues

From: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
To: Rene Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
Cc: Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net, "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JDBC 3.0 / JDK 1.4 build issues
Date: 2001-12-16 04:31:59
Message-ID: 3C1C23BF.2040007@xythos.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Rene,

Dave and I exchanged a few emails on this a while back, and I think what
we decided on was that we would support both make and ant independently
in 7.3. That means two independant methods of building the code,
makefiles that don't depend on ant, and ant that doesn't depend on make
calling it. Both build mechanisms have their pros and cons as was born
out in the long email thread on this topic a few weeks ago. I agreed to
work on/support the make build method and Dave agreed to support the ant
one.

thanks,
--Barry

Rene Pijlman wrote:

> On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 15:16:49 -0500, you wrote:
>
>>Well sort of...
>>We are using make to start ant, but we are using the ant
>>build file to build the jars
>>
>
> But is the plan to also enable building the driver without ant
> installed?
>
> Regards,
> René Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rene Pijlman 2001-12-16 21:43:37 JDK 1.4 challenge, opinions please
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-12-15 21:37:13 Re: JDBC 3.0 / JDK 1.4 build issues