Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "'Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD'" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin
Date: 2001-12-14 18:31:00
Message-ID: 3C1A4564.8090705@tm.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cygwin pgsql-hackers


Dave Page wrote:

>Although the original test was in Windows XP on a single processor box, the
>final tests that all passed were on Windows 2000 Server running on a Dual
>PIII 933MHz box with 1Gb of RAM. The motherboard is an MSI Pro 694D.
>
Has anyone done any tests comparing PostgreSQL on Win32 and *NIX
platforms on
same/similar hardware ?

I suspect that the initial connect could be slower on Win32 due to
reported slowness of
fork() there, but are there other issues ?

-------------------
Hannu

In response to

Browse pgsql-cygwin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-12-14 22:38:05 Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2001-12-14 18:24:27 Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2001-12-14 20:23:16 Mail for WhiteNinja
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2001-12-14 18:24:27 Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin