Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: largeobject

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Matteo Cavalleri <theos(at)bp(dot)lnf(dot)it>
Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: largeobject
Date: 2001-12-12 10:34:44
Message-ID: 3C1732C4.4BA37290@tpf.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc
Matteo Cavalleri wrote:
> 
> On 10 Dec 2001, at 15:54, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> 
> > Unfortunately vacuumlo doesn't take type lo into account.
> 
> In latest pgreplicator distribution we set up an alpha stage large
> object replication. The system works both on oid and lo types.
> We develop the following set of utilities that you can find useful if
> you are working on lo types:

What lo type are you using ?

There's a lo type in contrib/lo.
The type could be restored using pg_restore in 7.2
and vacuumlo in 7.2 also could handle the type
properly.

There's another lo type described in FAQ(Advanced)
at http://odbc.postgresql.org/. Unfortunately the
type is hard to handle for pg_restore or vacuumlo.

I've been thinking how to change from the latter to
the former but not found the solution yet.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Mike MillerDate: 2001-12-17 21:01:08
Subject: FW: Trouble with LargeObjects and ODBC, backend crash?
Previous:From: Matteo CavalleriDate: 2001-12-12 09:59:51
Subject: Re: largeobject

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group