Matteo Cavalleri wrote:
> On 10 Dec 2001, at 15:54, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > Unfortunately vacuumlo doesn't take type lo into account.
> In latest pgreplicator distribution we set up an alpha stage large
> object replication. The system works both on oid and lo types.
> We develop the following set of utilities that you can find useful if
> you are working on lo types:
What lo type are you using ?
There's a lo type in contrib/lo.
The type could be restored using pg_restore in 7.2
and vacuumlo in 7.2 also could handle the type
There's another lo type described in FAQ(Advanced)
at http://odbc.postgresql.org/. Unfortunately the
type is hard to handle for pg_restore or vacuumlo.
I've been thinking how to change from the latter to
the former but not found the solution yet.
In response to
pgsql-odbc by date
|Next:||From: Mike Miller||Date: 2001-12-17 21:01:08|
|Subject: FW: Trouble with LargeObjects and ODBC, backend crash?|
|Previous:||From: Matteo Cavalleri||Date: 2001-12-12 09:59:51|
|Subject: Re: largeobject|