Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > But making a patch to pg_dump is a matter of (say) up to 4 hours.
> > I'll do it since you seem to like it and nobody started doing it so far.
>
> Well, I'm in no way a major developer, so even if I do like it, I don't know
> what the chances are of it making its way into the tree.
If I stop using C++ comments '//', the chance might grew better ;-) [I
apologize again]
Since Philip also likes it ...
I would say it's a good feature to have and up to now most of my patches went
into the tree. So the chances are not that bad (though definitely not for 7.2).
Christof