| From: | Joe Conway <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Second call for platform testing |
| Date: | 2001-11-30 21:45:32 |
| Message-ID: | 3C07FDFC.9050200@home.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Okay, it looks like HP has implemented -0 finally. Try the other
> geometry comparison files to see if any match;
> geometry-positive-zeros.out is evidently only good for HPUX 10.
>
A little experimentation shows that "geometry-solaris-precision.out" is
a perfect match. Two questions:
1. Do we use "geometry-solaris-precision.out", or clone it with a more
appropriate name like "geometry-hpux11.out" or
"geometry-hpux-precision.out"?
2. The current resultmap says: "geometry/hppa=geometry-positive-zeros".
What do we modify to so that it differentiates between HPUX11 and
HPUX10? I see it's related to the config.guess output and the pg_regress
script, but it's not clear to me where to make a change.
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-11-30 22:49:09 | Re: Second call for platform testing |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-11-30 21:18:12 | Re: RC1 on Monday? |