Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Second call for platform testing

From: Joe Conway <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org
Subject: Re: Second call for platform testing
Date: 2001-11-30 06:34:43
Message-ID: 3C072883.3050905@home.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> That one's in the FAQ ;-).  Evidently HP still hasn't fixed that sh bug
> as of 11.0.  Should work if you use ksh instead, viz
> 
> 	gmake SHELL=/bin/ksh check
> 

Correct again (not that I ever doubted you)! Sorry, I should have known 
to look at the platform FAQ.

And after all that, the results:

====================================================
  2 of 79 tests failed, 1 of these failures ignored.
====================================================

geometry and random failed. The diffs are attached. The geometry diffs 
all look to be 0 vs -0.

Again, for reference:
$ model
9000/800/A500-44
$ uname -a
HP-UX csdoap2 B.11.00 A 9000/800

Joe

Attachment: regression.diffs
Description: text/plain (4.5 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Luis AmigoDate: 2001-11-30 08:40:56
Subject: Re: Call for platform testing
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-11-30 03:44:34
Subject: Re: Second call for platform testing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group