Re: Can a windows DLL have more than one process attached?

From: Mikhail Terekhov <terekhov(at)emc(dot)com>
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Can a windows DLL have more than one process attached?
Date: 2001-11-29 19:55:37
Message-ID: 3C0692B9.7080006@emc.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

After refreshing my memory I can say for sure that it never
worked on nt4 and w98, see

http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1030825

The reason is very simple: on nt4 & w98 (don't know about 95)
netmsg.dll doesn't contain socket error messages! I just checked
this on my work computer nt4(sp6).

Regards,
Mikhail

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>>
>>>I changed it by myself and have tested it since yesterday.
>>>I also tested a simple sample program. However I've got no
>>>message for winsock errors under Windows-NT 4.0.
>>>
>>It appeared to me that the parameters passed to FormatMessage
>>were wrong, too (the handle for netmsg.dll needs to be passed in,
>>I'd think).
>>
>
> I did so from the first. I also tried the latest cvs version
> but the result is the same. ISTM Mikhail Terekhov referred to
> the fact 3 months ago but I couldn't find the conclusion.
>
> regards,
> Hiroshi Inoue
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fernando Nasser 2001-11-29 20:16:26 Fwd: [PATCHES] Libpq support for precision and scale]
Previous Message Mikhail Terekhov 2001-11-29 16:52:48 Re: Can a windows DLL have more than one process attached?