Tom Lane wrote:
> The fault for the miscommunication is probably mine, in that I didn't
> make it clear to you in the beginning that time was of the essence.
> I would like to apologize for that and move on.
Thanks. Actually you were one most helpful with the port. I also
actually understood quite well that time was important. It was
moderation what killed the time. Distribution of first patch was delayed
by almost a week and second version was still delayed by few days... I
don't want to blame anyone for those delays, but wondering why the heck
you need manual approvals here. You require people to subscribe, so
what's the point?
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2001-11-28 19:37:48|
|Subject: Re: Support for QNX6, POSIX IPC and PTHREAD-style locking|
|Previous:||From: Greg Sabino Mullane||Date: 2001-11-28 18:33:53|
|Subject: Microtiming patch for psql (reprise)|