Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: bytea datatype documentation patch

From: Joe Conway <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bytea datatype documentation patch
Date: 2001-11-21 02:41:41
Message-ID: 3BFB1465.3070607@home.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> So I would base this discussion on the premise "bytea stores binary data"
> (insert examples).
> 
> Some stylistic issues:
> 
> bytea => <type>bytea</type>
> 
> NULLs => zero bytes/bytes of value zero ("NULL" is too overloaded)
> 
> 'non-printable' => <quote>nonprintable</quote>
> 
> MUST => <emphasis>must</emphasis>
> 

Here's a patch against *CVS tip* to address Peter's comments. Please let 
me know what you think!

Thanks,

Joe


Attachment: datatype-2.sgml.diff
Description: text/plain (15.4 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-11-21 03:17:47
Subject: Re: bytea datatype documentation patch
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2001-11-20 23:02:55
Subject: Re: Cross-references (was [PATCHES] PQescapeBytea documentation patch)

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-11-21 03:16:19
Subject: Re: bytea HISTORY updates
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2001-11-21 02:34:46
Subject: bytea HISTORY updates

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group