Re: [Fwd: QNX6 port (need some assistance from developers)]

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Igor Kovalenko <Igor(dot)Kovalenko(at)motorola(dot)com> writes:
> > The patch is made against 72b2 tarball (not CVS). Do you want me to just
> > post diffs or what do I do to get it merged? And where do I post it,
> > PORTS or PATCHES (as it might be interesting for many platforms)?
>
> Send it to patches. Note that I doubt we will have any interest in
> applying such a major change to 7.2 --- but we'll take a look at it
> for 7.3.

Why? The change only affects anything when HAVE_POSIX_IPC is defined and
that will only be defined on QNX6 (unless someone goes ahead and does it
for their platforms) which is not currently supported anyway. It still
builds cleanly and passes all tests when that constand is not defined
either.

- igor