Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [Fwd: QNX6 port (need some assistance from developers)]

From: Igor Kovalenko <Igor(dot)Kovalenko(at)motorola(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: QNX6 port (need some assistance from developers)]
Date: 2001-11-19 20:18:30
Message-ID: 3BF96916.FAA14BEF@motorola.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Igor Kovalenko <Igor(dot)Kovalenko(at)motorola(dot)com> writes:
> > The patch is made against 72b2 tarball (not CVS). Do you want me to just
> > post diffs or what do I do to get it merged? And where do I post it,
> > PORTS or PATCHES (as it might be interesting for many platforms)?
> 
> Send it to patches.  Note that I doubt we will have any interest in
> applying such a major change to 7.2 --- but we'll take a look at it
> for 7.3.

Why? The change only affects anything when HAVE_POSIX_IPC is defined and
that will only be defined on QNX6 (unless someone goes ahead and does it
for their platforms) which is not currently supported anyway. It still
builds cleanly and passes all tests when that constand is not defined
either.

- igor

In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-11-20 06:14:07
Subject: Re: Darwin/MacOSX 10.1.1 newbie
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-11-19 20:14:31
Subject: Re: [Fwd: QNX6 port (need some assistance from developers)]

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group