Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CommitFest status/management

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest status/management
Date: 2009-12-01 04:11:50
Message-ID: 3BEA9D4D-E267-4DD4-824D-636E10D61E0B@kineticode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Nov 30, 2009, at 8:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> I'm going to look at the YAML format for EXPLAIN patch shortly.
> 
> Do we have consensus yet that we want YAML?  It seemed, well,
> yet another format without all that much advantage over what's
> there.

Legibility++

David

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2009-12-01 04:17:04
Subject: Re: CommitFest status/management
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-12-01 04:08:19
Subject: Re: CommitFest status/management

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group