Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: J2SE 1.4 and other patches

From: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
To: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: J2SE 1.4 and other patches
Date: 2001-10-18 02:17:55
Message-ID: 3BCE3BD3.8070606@xythos.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Joseph,

To apply a patch you need to execute cvs commands.  But to submit a 
patch you only need to send the diffs and new files to this list or the 
pgsql-patches email list.

thanks,
--Barry

Joseph Shraibman wrote:

> Don't you need execute cvs commands to add new files?  I guess I don't 
> know.
> 
> Barry Lind wrote:
> 
>> Anyone can do that by submitting a patch.  I don't see anything 
>> special that needs to be done.
>>
>> --Barry
>>
>> Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>>
>>> Right.  And a maintainer needs to make a jdbc3 direcotry and modifiy 
>>> the ant files to use it when it detects a jdk of 1.4+
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave Cramer wrote:
>>>
>>>> What do you see wrong with the build process?
>>>>
>>>> Ant is used to build the driver!
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>>> [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Joseph Shraibman
>>>> Sent: October 16, 2001 5:45 PM
>>>> To: Rene Pijlman
>>>> Cc: Mark Lillywhite (pg-jdbc); pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>>> Subject: Re: [JDBC] J2SE 1.4 and other patches
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think what most needs to be done is for someone to update the build
>>>> process, so people who want to hack code will have somewhere to 
>>>> start from.
>>>>
>>>> Rene Pijlman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 13 Oct 2001 11:16:07 +1000, you wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I was just wondering if anyone is working on support for JDK1.4 
>>>>>> for the postgresql drivers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Not AFAIK.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> It appears that there are some new methods defined
>>>>>> in a few interfaces that need to be implemented (presumably to 
>>>>>> just throw the "unimplemented" exception?).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Do you mean JDBC 3.0 methods? What methods precisely? Are they 
>>>>> implementable?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, I have a patch for DatabaseMetaData to fix a bug in the 
>>>>>> metadata
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> returned for BigDecimals. I have already tried to submit this 
>>>>>> patch 2 or 3 times (to peter(at)retep) but never heard back. It's 
>>>>>> only about 4 LOC but it makes introspecting the database much better.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this the place to post a patch, and if I do, am I likely to get 
>>>>>> a response?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> You can send patches to the pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org list, 
>>>>> preferably with a CC to this list. Yes, you will get a response. 
>>>>> Usually, a patch is applied within a week (if the patch is good, of 
>>>>> course).
>>>>>
>>>>> If a patch to the JDBC driver needs discussion first, that should 
>>>>> be on this list.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> René Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------(end of 
>>>>> broadcast)---------------------------
>>>>> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 



In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Barry LindDate: 2001-10-18 02:37:27
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Previous:From: Dave CramerDate: 2001-10-18 01:16:47
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group