Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: J2SE 1.4 and other patches

From: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
To: Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: J2SE 1.4 and other patches
Date: 2001-10-17 01:47:24
Message-ID: 3BCCE32C.7030305@selectacast.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Right.  And a maintainer needs to make a jdbc3 direcotry and modifiy the ant files to use 
it when it detects a jdk of 1.4+


Dave Cramer wrote:

> What do you see wrong with the build process?
> 
> Ant is used to build the driver!
> 
> Dave
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Joseph Shraibman
> Sent: October 16, 2001 5:45 PM
> To: Rene Pijlman
> Cc: Mark Lillywhite (pg-jdbc); pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] J2SE 1.4 and other patches
> 
> 
> I think what most needs to be done is for someone to update the build
> process, so people 
> who want to hack code will have somewhere to start from.
> 
> Rene Pijlman wrote:
> 
> 
>>On 13 Oct 2001 11:16:07 +1000, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I was just wondering if anyone is working on support for JDK1.4 for 
>>>the postgresql drivers.
>>>
>>>
>>Not AFAIK.
>>
>>
>>
>>>It appears that there are some new methods defined
>>>in a few interfaces that need to be implemented (presumably to just 
>>>throw the "unimplemented" exception?).
>>>
>>>
>>Do you mean JDBC 3.0 methods? What methods precisely? Are they 
>>implementable?
>>
>>
>>
>>>Also, I have a patch for DatabaseMetaData to fix a bug in the metadata
>>>
> 
>>>returned for BigDecimals. I have already tried to submit this patch 2 
>>>or 3 times (to peter(at)retep) but never heard back. It's only about 4 
>>>LOC but it makes introspecting the database much better.
>>>
>>>Is this the place to post a patch, and if I do, am I likely to get a 
>>>response?
>>>
>>>
>>You can send patches to the pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org list, 
>>preferably with a CC to this list. Yes, you will get a response. 
>>Usually, a patch is applied within a week (if the patch is good, of 
>>course).
>>
>>If a patch to the JDBC driver needs discussion first, that should be 
>>on this list.
>>
>>Regards,
>>René Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
>>
>>---------------------------(end of 
>>broadcast)---------------------------
>>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Joseph Shraibman
jks(at)selectacast(dot)net
Increase signal to noise ratio.  http://www.targabot.com


In response to

Responses

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-10-17 01:51:01
Subject: Re: Ant configuration
Previous:From: Dave CramerDate: 2001-10-17 01:11:36
Subject: Re: J2SE 1.4 and other patches

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group