Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: iscachable settings for datetime functions

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: iscachable settings for datetime functions
Date: 2001-10-01 22:59:30
Message-ID: 3BB8F552.AC1117E9@fourpalms.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
...
> Well, I'll take responsibility for fixing that, if you want to spread
> the blame ;-).  It's my fault that those routines are marked cachable
> to begin with --- I hadn't dug into which datetime types had "current"
> and which didn't, just marked 'em all noncachable on sight.

I'm happy to do it; how about saving your cycles to look at the results.

                     - Thomas

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: John SummerfieldDate: 2001-10-01 23:00:31
Subject: Re: CVS changes
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-10-01 22:27:59
Subject: Re: iscachable settings for datetime functions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group