...
> Well, I'll take responsibility for fixing that, if you want to spread
> the blame ;-).  It's my fault that those routines are marked cachable
> to begin with --- I hadn't dug into which datetime types had "current"
> and which didn't, just marked 'em all noncachable on sight.

I'm happy to do it; how about saving your cycles to look at the results.

                     - Thomas

In response to

• Re: iscachable settings for datetime functions at 2001-10-01 22:27:59 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: John Summerfield	Date: 2001-10-01 23:00:31
	Subject: Re: CVS changes
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2001-10-01 22:27:59
	Subject: Re: iscachable settings for datetime functions