Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

WAL Log numbering

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: WAL Log numbering
Date: 2001-09-18 04:42:32
Message-ID: 3BA6D0B8.5C35AB03@postgresql.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Hi guys,

Running 7.1.3 on Mandrake Linux 8.0.

Just noticed the numbering sequence which the WAL log used here was :

DEBUG:  MoveOfflineLogs: remove 00000000000000FA
DEBUG:  MoveOfflineLogs: remove 00000000000000FB
DEBUG:  MoveOfflineLogs: remove 00000000000000FC
DEBUG:  MoveOfflineLogs: remove 00000000000000FD
DEBUG:  MoveOfflineLogs: remove 00000000000000FE
DEBUG:  MoveOfflineLogs: remove 0000000100000000
DEBUG:  MoveOfflineLogs: remove 0000000100000001
DEBUG:  MoveOfflineLogs: remove 0000000100000002
DEBUG:  MoveOfflineLogs: remove 0000000100000003
DEBUG:  MoveOfflineLogs: remove 0000000100000004
DEBUG:  MoveOfflineLogs: remove 0000000100000005
DEBUG:  MoveOfflineLogs: remove 0000000100000006

I would have though that after 00000000000000FE would be
0000000000000100, not 0000000100000000.

Just checked through the Interactive docs (not sure which version of 7.1
they are) and says the numbers should be sequential.  Just checked the
archives and didn't find anything regarding this.

Bug or not?

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

-- 
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
     - Indira Gandhi

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-09-18 06:40:59
Subject: Re: WAL Log numbering
Previous:From: John SummerfieldDate: 2001-09-17 18:58:55
Subject: CVS rejected me

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group