Re: factorial doc bug?

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: factorial doc bug?
Date: 2001-09-12 01:39:23
Message-ID: 3B9EBCCB.EB940934@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Are you saying we should remove the whole chapter below from the docs?

Actually, it may be simply that we (now) implement factorial operators
for int8, int4, and int2. Not sure what previous releases implemented,
but perhaps it is just an issue of knowing which one should be used for
the operation. If before we only had, say, int4, then the coersion code
could easily assume that it was the correct coersion.

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-09-12 04:01:52 Re: [HACKERS] to_char and Roman Numeral (RN) bug
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-09-12 01:38:58 Re: factorial doc bug?