Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] JDBC pg_description update needed for CVS tip

From: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] JDBC pg_description update needed for CVS tip
Date: 2001-09-07 06:39:53
Message-ID: 3B986BB9.6090403@xythos.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-jdbcpgsql-patches
Interestingly it was fixed in the getColumns() method, until a patch 
that was applied yesterday broke it again.

--Barry


Tom Lane wrote:
> Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> writes:
> 
>>I believe this was done a while ago.  (It looks like it was patched on 
>>Aug 17 by a patch from Rene).
>>
> 
> Looking again, getTables() seems to be fixed, but there is still an
> unpatched reference to pg_description in getColumns(), in both
> jdbc1 and jdbc2.
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> 
> 



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2001-09-07 06:47:21
Subject: Re: Bytea string operator support
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2001-09-07 05:52:14
Subject: Re: byteain bug(?)

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2001-09-07 06:47:21
Subject: Re: Bytea string operator support
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-09-07 05:34:46
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] JDBC pg_description update needed for CVS tip

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Tony GrantDate: 2001-09-07 07:23:31
Subject: Re: Why JDBC 1?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-09-07 05:34:46
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] JDBC pg_description update needed for CVS tip

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group