Re: truncated InputStream returned with getAsciiInputStream()

From: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
To: Isabelle Therrien <therriei(at)LUB(dot)UMontreal(dot)CA>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: truncated InputStream returned with getAsciiInputStream()
Date: 2001-09-01 01:37:06
Message-ID: 3B903BC2.8070203@xythos.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Is there a reason you are not using getBinaryStream()? You can't read a
binary file with and AsciiStream.

thanks,
--Barry

Isabelle Therrien wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've seen a couple of discussion about this subject, and I wonder if you
> could help me finding a workaround for my problem too.
>
> I work with big XML documents, around 12000 to 15000 characters. Since
> these documents were occasionnally causing me performance problems
> during store operations, I tried using java.util.zip package's "deflate"
> and "inflate" methods to compress my data. These method output byte
> arrays, and the bytes can have any arbitrary value. Including "-1".
>
> So now, to store my data in the database, I use BLOB instead of TEXT.
> It works fine, my data is stored and retreived without any problem with
> method set and getAsciiStream()... until there is a byte with value "-1"
> in my Stream. If the 43rd byte is "-1", the stream has a length of 42.
>
> The problem is that I cannot really escape the character, since it's
> compressed data, and I can't just remove it assuming it's a null
> character, cause it's not.
>
> Somebody has a clue?
>
> Isabelle
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2001-09-01 02:29:41 Re: Read transactions don't work on 7.0.x db's
Previous Message Jeff Eckermann 2001-08-31 21:49:01 Re: Regarding Vacuumdb